skip to primary navigationskip to content

Navigating Impasses in Bioethics: Rethinking Ill/Health

Navigating Impasses in Bioethics: Rethinking Ill/Health - imageContemporary discourse in bioethics and healthcare policy frequently arrives at an impasse caused by disagreement, often unspoken, about what constitutes ‘health’. Different understandings of ‘ill/health’ end up conflating different and sometimes contradictory moral considerations, which marrs political debate and generates insoluble impasses in policy making. As a result, politicians, academics, health practitioners and patients appear to be speaking different languages and entertaining widely diverse expectations.

Can a single definition of ill/health across different fields be arrived at? The strictly legal definition of the right to health is unworkable, as it involves an even more controversial ‘right to happiness’. From a faith perspective, for instance, being healthy does not simply mean the absence of pain. Similarly, mental ill/health in political debates is often addressed as a matter of diversity and equality rather than in terms of disability.

PROGRAMME

SPEAKERS & ABSTRACTS

Attendance is free but registration is required, as we have a limited number of places. For registration and any other question please contact  the project coordinators: Dr Thana Campos; Dr Lidia Ripamonti

UPDATE: papers from the conference are now published as a special issue of The New Bioethics (Vol. 22, Issue 1, 2016).


An interdisciplinary research hub inspired by Catholic thought and culture, focussed on contemporary global realities, and dedicated to encounter, dialogue, and transformation